Notice the progression in the poem fragment by Aquinas.
Aquinas:
... Your Blood, one drop of which can heal the entire world of all its sins.
Aquinas states a "
potentiality" and does not take it to an "
actuality". That is, it "
could" do so is all that is stated.
You may have heard:
One drop of Jesus's blood was sufficient to cover the sins of all humanity for all of time. Let it cover us.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/419ef/419efaeccb76a99402019d45d3ac58e5a189aa10" alt="Blood drop" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/48e16/48e1674ac84ef648506b087de4c4eac85f71cde8" alt="Cross" |
Was one drop of blood sufficient?
|
Was the cross necessary?
|
Some pastors (and others) take the "
potentiality" (by Aquinas) and change it to an "
actuality" to be a given fact that has already happened.
The same logical errors are made when Jesus provides an analogy as that something is "
like" something else. Soon, sermons are given as if the analogy has actually happened in reality.
Discuss: Is making such logical leaps without any apparent logical validity deceptive?