Notice the progression in the poem fragment by Aquinas.
Aquinas:
... Your Blood, one drop of which can heal the entire world of all its sins.
Aquinas states a "
potentiality" and does not take it to an "
actuality". That is, it "
could" do so is all that is stated.
You may have heard:
One drop of Jesus's blood was sufficient to cover the sins of all humanity for all of time. Let it cover us.
|
|
Was one drop of blood sufficient?
|
Was the cross necessary?
|
Some pastors (and others) take the "
potentiality" (by Aquinas) and change it to an "
actuality" to be a given fact that has already happened.
The same logical errors are made when Jesus provides an analogy as that something is "
like" something else. Soon, sermons are given as if the analogy has actually happened in reality.
Discuss: Is making such logical leaps without any apparent logical validity deceptive?